II. Explanation of the Bill
A. Amendments to Title I of the 1997 Act Relating to the Child Credit
1. Stacking rules for the child credit under the limitations based on tax liability
(Sec. 6003(a) of the Bill, Sec. 101(a) of the 1997 Act, and Sec. 24 of the Code)
Present Law
Present law provides a $500 ($400 for taxable year 1998) tax credit for each qualifying
child under the age of 17. A qualifying child is defined as an individual for whom the taxpayer can
claim a dependency exemption and who is a son or daughter of the taxpayer (or a descendent of
either), a stepson or stepdaughter of the taxpayer or an eligible foster child of the taxpayer. For
taxpayers with modified adjusted gross income in excess of certain thresholds, the allowable child
credit is phased out. The length of the phase-out range is affected by the number of the taxpayer's
qualifying children.
Generally, the maximum amount of a taxpayer's child credit for each taxable year is limited
to the excess of the taxpayer's regular tax liability over the taxpayer's tentative minimum tax
liability (determined without regard to the alternative minimum foreign tax credit). in the case of a
taxpayer with three or more qualifying children, the maximum amount of the taxpayer's child credit
for each taxable year is limited to the greater of: (1) the amount computed under the rule described
above, or (2) an amount equal to the excess of the sum of the taxpayer's regular income tax liability
and the employee share of FICA taxes (and one-half of the taxpayer's SECA tax liability, if
applicable) reduced by the earned income credit. in the case of a taxpayer with three or more
qualifying children, the excess of the amount allowed in (2) over the amount computed in (1) is a
refundable credit.
Nonrefundable credits may not be used to reduce tax liability below a taxpayer's tentative
minimum tax. Certain credits not used as result of this rule may be carried over to other taxable
years, while others may not. Special stacking rules apply in determining which nonrefundable
credits are used in the current year. Generally, the stacking rules require that nonrefundable
personal credits be considered first, followed by other credits, business credits, and the
investment tax credit. Refundable credits, which are not limited by the minimum tax, are not
stacked until after the nonrefundable credits.
Explanation of Provision
The bill clarifies the application of the income tax liability limitation to the refundable
portion of the child credit by treating the refundable portion of the child credit in the same way as
the other refundable credits. Specifically, after all the other credits are applied according to the
stacking rules of the income tax limitation then the refundable credits are applied first to reduce the
taxpayer's tax liability for the year and then to provide a credit in excess of income tax liability for
the year.
Effective Date
The provision is effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 1997.
2. Treatment of a portion of the child credit as a supplemental child credit (Sec.
6003(b) of the Bill, Sec. 101(b) of the 1997 Act, and Sec. 32(n) of the Code)
Present Law
A portion of the child credit may be treated as a supplemental child credit. The
supplemental child credit is treated as provided under the earned income credit and the child credit
amount is reduced by the amount of the supplemental child credit.
Explanation of Provision
The bill clarifies that the treatment of a portion of the child credit as a supplemental child
credit under the earned income credit (Sec. 32) and the offsetting reduction of the child credit (Sec.
24) does not affect the total tax credits allowed to the taxpayer or any other tax credit available to
the taxpayer. Rather, it simply reduces the otherwise allowable nonrefundable child credit dollar
for-dollar by the amount treated as a supplemental child credit. The bill also clarifies that the
amount of the supplemental child credit under section 32(n) is the lesser of (1) the amount by
which the taxpayer's total nonrefundable personal credits (as limited by the tax liability limitation of
section 26(a)) are increased by reason of the child credit, or (2) the "negative" tax liability of the
taxpayer, defined as the excess of taxpayer's total tax credits, including the earned income credit
over the sum of the taxpayer's regular income taxes and social security taxes. For purposes of this
calculation, subsection 32(n) is not taken into account. The bill also clarifies that the earned
income credit rules (e.g., the phaseout of the earned income credit) generally do not apply to the
supplemental child credit.
Effective Date
The provision is effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 1997.
B. Amendments to Title II of the 1997 Act Relating to Education Incentives
1. Clarifications to HOPE and Lifetime Learning tax credits (Sec. 6004(a) of the
bill, Sec. 201 of the 1997 Act, and Secs. 25A and 6050S of the Code)
Present Law
Individual taxpayers are allowed to claim a nonrefundable HOPE credit against Federal
income taxes up to $1,500 per student for qualified tuition and fees paid during the year on behalf
of a student (i.e., the taxpayer, the taxpayer's spouse, or a dependent of the taxpayer) who is
enrolled in a post-secondary degree or certificate program at an eligible post-secondary institution
on at least a half-time basis. The HOPE credit is available only for the first two years of a
student's post-secondary education. The credit rate is 100 percent of the first $1,000 of qualified
tuition and fees and 50 percent on the next $1,000 of qualified tuition and fees. The HOPE credit
amount that a taxpayer may otherwise claim is phased out for taxpayers with modified adjusted
gross income (AGI) between $40,000 and $50,000 ($80,000 and $100,000 for joint returns). For
taxable years beginning after 2001, the $1,500 maximum HOPE credit amount and the AGI phase
out range will be indexed for inflation. The HOPE credit is available for expenses paid after
December 31, 1997, for education furnished in academic periods beginning after such date.
If a student is not eligible for the HOPE credit (or in lieu of claiming a HOPE credit with
respect to a student), individual taxpayers are allowed to claim a nonrefundable Lifetime Learning
credit against Federal income taxes equal to 20 percent of qualified tuition and fees paid during the
taxable year on behalf of the taxpayer, the taxpayer's spouse, or a dependent. in contrast to the
HOPE credit, the student need not be enrolled on at least a half-time basis in order to be eligible for
the Lifetime Learning credit, which is available for an unlimited number of years of post-secondary
training. For expenses paid before January 1, 2003, up to $5,000 of qualified tuition and fees per
taxpayer return will be eligible for the Lifetime Learning credit (i.e., the maximum credit per
taxpayer return will be $1,000). For expenses paid after December 31, 2002, up to $10,000 of
qualified tuition and fees per taxpayer return will be eligible for the Lifetime Learning credit (i.e.,
the maximum credit per taxpayer return will be $2,000). The Lifetime Learning credit amount that
a taxpayer may otherwise claim is phased out over the same modified AGI phase-out range as
applies for purposes of the HOPE credit. The Lifetime Learning credit is available for expenses
paid after June 30, 1998, for education furnished in academic periods beginning after such date.
Section 6050S provides that certain educational institutions and other taxpayers engaged in
a trade or business must file information returns with the IRS and certain individual taxpayers, as
required by regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury, containing information on
individuals who made payments for qualified tuition and related expenses or to whom
reimbursements or refunds were made of such expenses.
Explanation of Provision
The bill clarifies that, under section 6050S, information returns containing information with
respect to qualified tuition and fees must be filed by a person that is not an eligible educational
institution only if such person is engaged in a trade or business of making payments to any
individual under an insurance arrangement as reimbursements or refunds (or similar payments) of
qualified tuition and related expenses. As under present law, section 6050S will continue to
require the filing of information returns by persons engaged in a trade or business if, in the course
of such trade or business, the person receives from any individual interest aggregating $600 or
more for any calendar year on one or more qualified education loans.
Effective Date
The provision is effective as if included in the 1997 Act--i.e., for expenses paid after
December 31, 1997, for education furnished in academic periods beginning after such date.
2. Education IRAs (Sec. 6004(d) of the Bill, Sec. 213 of the 1997 Act, and Sec.
530 of the Code)
Present Law
Section 530 provides that taxpayers may establish "education IRAs," meaning certain trusts
or custodial accounts created exclusively for the purpose of paying qualified higher education
expenses of a named beneficiary. Annual contributions to education IRAs may not exceed $500
per designated beneficiary, and may not be made after the designated beneficiary reaches age 18.
Contributions to an education IRA may not be made by certain high-income taxpayers--i.e., the
contribution limit is phased out for taxpayers with modified adjusted gross income between
$95,000 and $110,000 ($150,000 and $160,000 for taxpayers filing joint returns). No
contribution may be made to an education IRA during any year in which any contributions are
made by anyone to a qualified State tuition program on behalf of the same beneficiary.
Until a distribution is made from an education IRA, earnings on contributions to the
account generally are not subject to tax. in addition, distributions from an education IRA are
excludable from gross income to the extent that the distribution does not exceed qualified higher
education expenses incurred by the beneficiary during the year the distribution is made (provided
that a HOPE credit or Lifetime Learning credit is not claimed with respect to the beneficiary for the
same taxable year). The earnings portion of an education IRA distribution not used to pay
qualified higher education expenses is includible in the gross income of the distributee and
generally is subject to an additional 10-percent tax. However, the additional 10-percent tax does
not apply if a distribution is made of excess contributions above the $500 limit (and any earnings
attributable to such excess contributions) if the distribution is made on or before the date that a
return is required to be filed (including extensions of time) by the contributor for the year in which
the excess contribution was made. in addition, section 530 allows tax-free rollovers of account
balances from an education IRA benefiting one family member to an education IRA benefiting
another family member. Section 530 is effective for taxable years beginning after December 31,
1997.
Explanation of Provision
Consistent with the legislative history to the 1997 Act, the bill provides that any balance
remaining in an education IRA will be deemed to be distributed within 30 days after the date that
the designated beneficiary reaches age 30 (or, if earlier, within 30 days of the date that the
beneficiary dies). The bill further clarifies that, in the event of the death of the designated
beneficiary, the balance remaining in an education IRA may be distributed (without imposition of
the additional 10-percent tax) to any other (i.e., contingent) beneficiary or to the estate of the
deceased designated beneficiary. If any member of the family of the deceased beneficiary becomes
the new designated beneficiary of an education IRA, then no tax will be imposed on such
redesignation and the account will continue to be treated as an education IRA.
Under the bill, the additional 10-percent tax provided for by section 530(d)(4) will not
apply to a distribution from an education IRA, which (although used to pay for qualified higher
education expenses) is includible in the beneficiary's gross income solely because the taxpayer
elects to claim a HOPE or Lifetime Learning credit with respect to the beneficiary. The bill further
provides that the additional 10-percent tax will not apply to the distribution of any contribution to
an education IRA made during a taxable year if such distribution is made on or before the date that
a return is required to be filed (including extensions of time) by the
beneficiary for the taxable year
during which the contribution was made (or, if the beneficiary is not required to file such a return,
April 15th of the year following the taxable year during which the contribution was made). In
addition, the bill amends section 4973(e) to provide that the excise tax penalty applies under that
section for each year that an excess contribution remains in an education IRA (and not merely the
year that the excess contribution is made).
The bill clarifies that, in order for taxpayers to establish an education IRA, the designated
beneficiary must be a life-in-being. The bill also clarifies that, under rules contained in present-law
section 72, distributions from education IRAs are treated as representing a pro-rata share of the
principal (i.e., contributions) and accumulated earnings in the account.
The bill also provides that, if any qualified higher education expenses are taken into account
in determining the amount of the exclusion under section 530 for a distribution from an education
IRA, then no deduction (under section 162 or any other section), or exclusion (under section 135)
or credit will be allowed under the Internal Revenue Code with respect to such qualified higher
education expenses.
In addition, because the 1997 Act allows taxpayers to redeem U.S. Savings Bonds and be
eligible for the exclusion under present-law section 135 (as if the proceeds were used to pay
qualified higher education expenses) provided the proceeds from the redemption are contributed to
an education IRA (or to a qualified State tuition program defined under section 529) on behalf of
the taxpayer, the taxpayer's spouse, or a dependent, the bill conforms the definition of "eligible
educational institution" under section 135 to the broader definition of that term under present-law
section 530 (and section 529). Thus, for purposes of section 135, as under present-law sections
529 and 530, the term "eligible educational institution" is defined as an institution which (1) is
described in section 481 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1088) and (2) is eligible
to participate in Department of Education student aid programs.
Effective Date
The provisions are effective as if included in the 1997 Act--i.e., for taxable years beginning
after December 31, 1997.