Treasury Decision 9214 |
August 29, 2005 |
Predeceased Parent Rule
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.
ACTION: Final regulations.
This document contains final regulations relating to the predeceased
parent rule, which provides an exception to the general rules of section 2651
of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) for determining the generation assignment
of a transferee of property for generation-skipping transfer (GST) tax purposes.
These regulations also provide rules regarding a transferee assigned to more
than one generation. The regulations reflect changes to the law made by the
Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 and generally apply to individuals, trusts, and
estates.
Effective Date: These regulations are effective
July 18, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lian A. Mito at (202) 622-7830 (not a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
On September 3, 2004, a notice of proposed rulemaking (REG-145988-03,
2004-42 I.R.B. 693) relating to the predeceased parent rule was published
in the Federal Register (69 FR 53862). The
public hearing scheduled for December 14, 2004, was cancelled because no requests
to speak were received. Written comments responding to the notice of proposed
rulemaking were received. After consideration of all the comments, the proposed
regulations are adopted as amended by this Treasury decision. The revisions
are discussed below.
The proposed regulations provided that, for purposes of determining
whether the predeceased parent rule applies, an individual transferee’s
interest in property is established or derived at the time the transferor
who transferred the property is subject to either the gift or estate tax on
the property. If the transferor will be subject to a transfer tax imposed
on the property transferred on more than one occasion, then the relevant time
for determining whether the predeceased parent rule applies is the earliest
time at which the transferor is subject to the gift or estate tax. In the
case of a trust for which an election under section 2056(b)(7) (QTIP election)
has been made, the proposed regulations provided that the interest of the
remainder beneficiary is considered as established or derived when the QTIP
trust was established. However, the proposed regulations also included an
exception to this general rule by providing that, to the extent of the QTIP
(but not a reverse QTIP) election, the remainder beneficiary’s interest
is deemed to have been established or derived on the death of the transferor’s
spouse (the income beneficiary), rather than on the transferor’s earlier
death.
One commentator indicated that this exception is unnecessary. The commentator
believes that the proposed regulations misinterpreted the statute because
a remainder beneficiary’s interest in a trust that is subject to a QTIP
(but not a reverse QTIP) election should always be deemed to have been established,
not at the time of the trust’s creation, but rather at the time when
the income-beneficiary spouse is first subject to gift or estate tax on the
trust property. This position applies the definition of “transferor”
in section 2652 in the context of the reference to “established and
derived” in section 2651(e), and is based on the conclusion that the
tax in this situation is not imposed on the same transferor on more than one
occasion. Thus, because the donee or surviving spouse becomes the transferor
of a trust that is subject to a QTIP (but not reverse QTIP) election, the
remainder beneficiary’s interest in such a trust is established upon
that spouse’s gift of an interest in the trust or that spouse’s
death, in each case the time at which gift or estate tax on the trust is first
imposed on that spouse. Viewed from this perspective, this provision of the
proposed regulations is not an exception. The Treasury Department and the
IRS agree, and the final regulations adopt the suggested change.
Under the proposed regulations, the predeceased parent rule does not
apply to transfers to collateral heirs if, at the time of the transfer, “the
transferor (or the transferor’s spouse or former spouse) has any living
lineal descendant.” Thus, under the proposed regulations, if, at the
time of the transfer, the transferor has no living lineal descendants but
the transferor’s spouse or former spouse does, the predeceased parent
rule will not apply to any transfer by the transferor to a collateral heir.
A number of commentators pointed out that the parenthetical language is inconsistent
with the purpose and language of the statute, and will inappropriately narrow
the application of the predeceased parent rule with respect to collateral
heirs. The Treasury Department and the IRS agree, and the parenthetical language
is removed in the final regulations. Accordingly, the final regulations require
that, for the predeceased parent rule to apply to transfers to collateral
heirs, only the transferor must have no living lineal descendants at the time
of the transfer.
The proposed regulations provided an exception to the general rule that
assigns an individual to the youngest of the generations to which that individual
may be assigned. Under the exception, an adopted individual will be treated
as a member of the generation that is one generation below the adoptive parent
for purposes of determining whether a transfer to the adopted individual from
the adoptive parent (or the spouse or former spouse of the adoptive parent,
or a lineal descendant of a grandparent of the adoptive parent) is subject
to the GST tax. The proposed regulations defined an “adopted individual”
as an individual who is: (1) a descendant of a parent of the adoptive parent
(or the spouse or former spouse of the adoptive parent); and (2) under the
age of 18 at the time of the adoption.
Two commentators expressed concern that this objective test (specifically,
the age at the time of the adoption) provides a strong inducement to engage
in a tax-motivated adoption, particularly in the case of older minors, because
of the amount of GST tax that thereby may be avoided. One commentator suggested
lowering the limit on the age of the individual at the time of the adoption
for purposes of the test. The other commentator recommended adding a third
element to the definition of adopted individual, namely, that the individual
was not adopted primarily for tax-avoidance purposes.
The Treasury Department and the IRS continue to believe that certain
adopted minors should be treated as a member of the generation that is one
generation below the adoptive parent, but only if the adoption is not primarily
for the purpose of avoiding GST tax. Therefore, under the final regulations,
the adopted individual will be treated as a member of the generation that
is one generation below the adoptive parent for purposes of determining whether
transfers from certain individuals to the adopted individual are subject to
GST tax if the following requirements are satisfied: (1) the individual is
legally adopted by the adoptive parent; (2) the individual is a descendant
of a parent of the adoptive parent (or the adoptive parent’s spouse
or former spouse); (3) the individual is under the age of 18 at the time of
the adoption; and (4) the individual is not adopted primarily for GST tax-avoidance
purposes. The determination of whether an adoption is primarily for GST tax-avoidance
purposes is to be made based upon all of the facts and circumstances. The
Treasury Department and IRS believe that the most significant factor to be
considered is whether there is a bona fide parent/child
relationship between the adoptive parent and the adopted individual. Other
factors that may be considered include (but are not limited to): the age
of the adopted individual at the time of the adoption, and the relationship
between the adopted individual and the individual’s parents immediately
before the adoption. Thus, the adoption of an infant will be less likely
to be considered primarily for tax-avoidance purposes than the adoption of
an individual who is age 17. Objective evidence that the parent was unwilling
or unable to act as the individual’s parent (e.g.,
the parent abandons the individual, or is adjudicated incompetent or incapacitated)
may indicate that an adoption is not primarily for tax-avoidance purposes.
One commentator suggested clarifying the interaction between section
2651(b)(3), regarding the treatment of legal adoptions, and section 2651(f)(1),
regarding individuals assigned to more than one generation. In order to provide
that clarification, the Treasury Department and the IRS confirm that, for
purposes of chapter 13, a legal adoption may create an additional generation
assignment, but the adoption does not constitute a substitute for the blood
relationship. Specifically, an individual who has been adopted will be treated
as a blood relative of the adoptive parent under section 2651(b)(3) and generally
is treated as a child of the adoptive parent under state law. In spite of
the adoption, however, the adopted individual also continues to be a blood
relative of the individual’s birth parents. Thus, the generation assignment
of the adopted individual with regard to a transfer from an ancestor of the
birth parent, for example, will continue to be measured under section 2651(b),
but, subject to the exception in §26.2651-2(b), the relationship between
them may be subject to the special rule in section 2651(f)(1), which provides
that an individual who would be assigned to more than one generation is assigned
to the youngest of those generations.
The proposed regulations provided that any individual who dies no later
than 90 days after a transfer is treated as having predeceased the transferor.
One commentator recommended that the final regulations apply this 90-day
rule to inter vivos, as well as testamentary, transfers. The 90-day rule
is intended to replace a similar 90-day rule in §26.2612-1(a)(2), which
is limited to testamentary transfers. Moreover, many state statutes contain
similar rules that apply only to testamentary transfers. Accordingly, the
final regulations do not adopt this recommendation, and revise the language
of this provision to confirm that it addresses only transfers occurring by
reason of the death of the transferor.
Two commentators requested confirmation that the reference to adoption
in §26.2651-2(b) applies solely for purposes of the rule in section 2651(f)(1)
and has no application to the rule in section 2651(b). Accordingly, the introductory
language of §26.2651-2(b) has been revised.
It has been determined that these proposed regulations are not a significant
regulatory action as defined in Executive Order 12866. Therefore, a regulatory
assessment is not required. It also has been determined that section 553(b)
of the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 5) does not apply to
these regulations and, because these regulations do not impose a collection
of information on small entities, the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
chapter 6) does not apply. Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the Code, the notice
of proposed rulemaking preceding these regulations was submitted to the Chief
Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration for comment on their
impact on small entities.
Amendments to the Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 26 is amended as follows:
PART 26—GENERATION-SKIPPING TRANSFER TAX REGULATIONS UNDER THE
TAX REFORM ACT OF 1986
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 26 continues to read,
in part, as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Par. 2. In §26.2600-1, the table is amended by:
1. Removing the entries for §26.2612-1, paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2).
2. Adding entries for §§26.2651-1, 26.2651-2, and 26.2651-3.
The additions read as follows:
§26.2600-1 Table of contents.
* * * * *
§26.2651-1 Generation assignment.
(a) Special rule for persons with a deceased parent.
(1) In general.
(2) Special rules.
(3) Established or derived.
(4) Special rule in the case of additional contributions to a trust.
(b) Limited application to collateral heirs.
(c) Examples.
§26.2651-2 Individual assigned to more than one generation.
(a) In general.
(b) Exception.
(c) Special rules.
(1) Corresponding generation adjustment.
(2) Continued application of generation assignment.
(d) Example.
§26.2651-3 Effective dates.
(a) In general.
(b) Transition rule.
Par. 3. Section 26.2612-1 is amended by:
1. Removing the paragraph designation and heading for (a)(1).
2. Removing paragraph (a)(2).
3. Removing the second sentence of paragraph (f) introductory text.
4. Removing Examples 6 and 7 in
paragraph (f).
5. Redesignating Examples 8 through 15 as Examples
6 through 13 in paragraph (f).
6. Revising the first sentence of newly designated Example 7 in paragraph
(f).
7. Revising the first sentence of newly designated Example
11 in paragraph (f).
The revisions read as follows:
* * * * *
(f) * * *
Example 7. Taxable termination resulting
from distribution. The facts are the same as in Example
6, except twenty years after C’s death the trustee exercises
its discretionary power and distributes the entire principal to GGC. * * *
* * * * *
Example 11. Exercise of withdrawal
right as taxable distribution. The facts are the same as in Example
10, except GC holds a continuing right to withdraw trust principal
and after one year GC withdraws $10,000. * * *
* * * * *
Par. 4. Sections 26.2651-1, 26.2651-2 and 26.2651-3 are added to read
as follows:
§26.2651-1 Generation assignment.
(a) Special rule for persons with a deceased parent—(1) In
general. This paragraph (a) applies for purposes of determining
whether a transfer to or for the benefit of an individual who is a descendant
of a parent of the transferor (or the transferor’s spouse or former
spouse) is a generation-skipping transfer. If that individual’s parent,
who is a lineal descendant of the parent of the transferor (or the transferor’s
spouse or former spouse), is deceased at the time the transfer (from which
an interest of such individual is established or derived) is subject to the
tax imposed on the transferor by chapter 11 or 12 of the Internal Revenue
Code, the individual is treated as if that individual were a member of the
generation that is one generation below the lower of—
(i) The transferor’s generation; or
(ii) The generation assignment of the individual’s youngest living
lineal ancestor who is also a descendant of the parent of the transferor (or
the transferor’s spouse or former spouse).
(2) Special rules—(i) Corresponding
generation adjustment. If an individual’s generation assignment
is adjusted with respect to a transfer in accordance with paragraph (a)(1)
of this section, a corresponding adjustment with respect to that transfer
is made to the generation assignment of each—
(A) Spouse or former spouse of that individual;
(B) Descendant of that individual; and
(C) Spouse or former spouse of each descendant of that individual.
(ii) Continued application of generation assignment.
If a transfer to a trust would be a generation-skipping transfer but for
paragraph (a)(1) of this section, any generation assignment determined under
this paragraph (a) continues to apply in determining whether any subsequent
distribution from (or termination of an interest in) the portion of the trust
attributable to that transfer is a generation-skipping transfer.
(iii) Ninety-day rule. For purposes of paragraph
(a)(1) of this section, any individual who dies no later than 90 days after
a transfer occurring by reason of the death of the transferor is treated as
having predeceased the transferor.
(iv) Local law. A living person is not treated
as having predeceased the transferor solely by reason of a provision of applicable
local law; e.g., an individual who disclaims is not treated
as a predeceased parent solely because state law treats a disclaimant as having
predeceased the transferor for purposes of determining the disposition of
the disclaimed property.
(3) Established or derived. For purposes of section
2651(e) and paragraph (a)(1) of this section, an individual’s interest
is established or derived at the time the transferor is subject to transfer
tax on the property. See §26.2652-1(a) for the definition of a transferor.
If the same transferor, on more than one occasion, is subject to transfer
tax imposed by either chapter 11 or 12 of the Internal Revenue Code on the
property so transferred (whether the same property, reinvestments thereof,
income thereon, or any or all of these), then the relevant time for determining
whether paragraph (a)(1) of this section applies is the earliest time at which
the transferor is subject to the tax imposed by either chapter 11 or 12 of
the Internal Revenue Code. For purposes of section 2651(e) and paragraph
(a)(1) of this section, the interest of a remainder beneficiary of a trust
for which an election under section 2523(f) or section 2056(b)(7) (QTIP election)
has been made will be deemed to have been established or derived, to the extent
of the QTIP election, on the date as of which the value of the trust corpus
is first subject to tax under section 2519 or section 2044. The preceding
sentence does not apply to a trust, however, to the extent that an election
under section 2652(a)(3) (reverse QTIP election) has been made for the trust
because, to the extent of a reverse QTIP election, the spouse who established
the trust will remain the transferor of the trust for generation-skipping
transfer tax purposes.
(4) Special rule in the case of additional contributions to
a trust. If a transferor referred to in paragraph (a)(1) of this
section contributes additional property to a trust that existed before the
application of paragraph (a)(1), then the additional property is treated as
being held in a separate trust for purposes of chapter 13 of the Internal
Revenue Code. The provisions of §26.2654-1(a)(2), regarding treatment
as separate trusts, apply as if different transferors had contributed to the
separate portions of the single trust. Additional subsequent contributions
from that transferor will be added to the new share that is treated as a separate
trust.
(b) Limited application to collateral heirs. Paragraph
(a) of this section does not apply in the case of a transfer to any individual
who is not a lineal descendant of the transferor (or the transferor’s
spouse or former spouse) if the transferor has any living lineal descendant
at the time of the transfer.
(c) Examples. The following examples illustrate
the provisions of this section:
Example 1. T establishes an irrevocable trust,
Trust, providing that trust income is to be paid to T’s grandchild,
GC, for 5 years. At the end of the 5-year period or on GC’s prior death,
Trust is to terminate and the principal is to be distributed to GC if GC is
living or to GC’s children if GC has died. The transfer that occurred
on the creation of the trust is subject to the tax imposed by chapter 12 of
the Internal Revenue Code and, at the time of the transfer, T’s child,
C, who is a parent of GC, is deceased. GC is treated as a member of the generation
that is one generation below T’s generation. As a result, GC is not
a skip person and Trust is not a skip person. Therefore, the transfer to
Trust is not a direct skip. Similarly, distributions to GC during the term
of Trust and at the termination of Trust will not be GSTs.
Example 2. On January 1, 2004, T transfers $100,000
to an irrevocable inter vivos trust that provides T with an annuity payable
for four years or until T’s prior death. The annuity satisfies the
definition of a qualified interest under section 2702(b). When the trust
terminates, the corpus is to be paid to T’s grandchild, GC. The transfer
is subject to the tax imposed by chapter 12 of the Internal Revenue Code and,
at the time of the transfer, T’s child, C, who is a parent of GC, is
living. C dies in 2006. In this case, C was alive at the time the transfer
by T was subject to the tax imposed by chapter 12 of the Internal Revenue
Code. Therefore, section 2651(e) and paragraph (a)(1) of this section do
not apply. When the trust subsequently terminates, the distribution to GC
is a taxable termination that is subject to the GST tax to the extent the
trust has an inclusion ratio greater than zero. See section 2642(a).
Example 3. T dies testate in 2002, survived by
T’s spouse, S, their children, C1 and C2, and C1’s child, GC.
Under the terms of T’s will, a trust is established for the benefit
of S and of T and S’s descendants. Under the terms of the trust, all
income is payable to S during S’s lifetime and the trustee may distribute
trust corpus for S’s health, support and maintenance. At S’s
death, the corpus is to be distributed, outright, to C1 and C2. If either
C1 or C2 has predeceased S, the deceased child’s share of the corpus
is to be distributed to that child’s then-living descendants, per stirpes.
The executor of T’s estate makes the election under section 2056(b)(7)
to treat the trust property as qualified terminable interest property (QTIP)
but does not make the election under section 2652(a)(3) (reverse QTIP election).
In 2003, C1 dies survived by S and GC. In 2004, S dies, and the trust terminates.
The full fair market value of the trust is includible in S’s gross
estate under section 2044 and S becomes the transferor of the trust under
section 2652(a)(1)(A). GC’s interest is considered established or derived
at S’s death, and because C1 is deceased at that time, GC is treated
as a member of the generation that is one generation below the generation
of the transferor, S. As a result, GC is not a skip person and the transfer
to GC is not a direct skip.
Example 4. The facts are the same as in Example
3. However, the executor of T’s estate makes the election
under section 2652(a)(3) (reverse QTIP election) for the entire trust. Therefore,
T remains the transferor because, for purposes of chapter 13 of the Internal
Revenue Code, the election to be treated as qualified terminable interest
property is treated as if it had not been made. In this case, GC’s
interest is established or derived on T’s death in 2002. Because C1
was living at the time of T’s death, the predeceased parent rule under
section 2651(e) does not apply, even though C1 was deceased at the time the
transfer from S to GC was subject to the tax under chapter 11 of the Internal
Revenue Code. When the trust terminates, the distribution to GC is a taxable
termination that is subject to the GST tax to the extent the trust has an
inclusion ratio greater than zero. See section 2642(a).
Example 5. T establishes an irrevocable trust
providing that trust income is to be paid to T’s grandniece, GN, for
5 years or until GN’s prior death. At the end of the 5-year period
or on GN’s prior death, the trust is to terminate and the principal
is to be distributed to GN if living, or if GN has died, to GN’s then-living
descendants, per stirpes. S is a sibling of T and the parent of N. N is
the parent of GN. At the time of the transfer, T has no living lineal descendant,
S is living, N is deceased, and the transfer is subject to the gift tax imposed
by chapter 12 of the Internal Revenue Code. GN is treated as a member of
the generation that is one generation below T’s generation because S,
GN’s youngest living lineal ancestor who is also a descendant of T’s
parent, is in T’s generation. As a result, GN is not a skip person
and the transfer to the trust is not a direct skip. In addition, distributions
to GN during the term of the trust and at the termination of the trust will
not be GSTs.
Example 6. On January 1, 2004, T transfers $50,000
to a great-grandniece, GGN, who is the great-grandchild of B, a brother of
T. At the time of the transfer, T has no living lineal descendants and B’s
grandchild, GN, who is a parent of GGN and a child of B’s living child,
N, is deceased. GGN will be treated as a member of the generation that is
one generation below the lower of T’s generation or the generation assignment
of GGN’s youngest living lineal ancestor who is also a descendant of
the parent of the transferor. In this case, N is GGN’s youngest living
lineal ancestor who is also a descendant of the parent of T. Because N’s
generation assignment is lower than T’s generation, GGN will be treated
as a member of the generation that is one generation below N’s generation
assignment (i.e., GGN will be treated as a member of
her parent’s generation). As a result, GGN remains a skip person and
the transfer to GGN is a direct skip.
Example 7. T has a child, C. C and C’s
spouse, S, have a 20-year-old child, GC. C dies and S subsequently marries
S2. S2 legally adopts GC. T transfers $100,000 to GC. Under section 2651(b)(1),
GC is assigned to the generation that is two generations below T. However,
since GC’s parent, C, is deceased at the time of the transfer, GC will
be treated as a member of the generation that is one generation below T.
As a result, GC is not a skip person and the transfer to GC is not a direct
skip.
§26.2651-2 Individual assigned to more than 1 generation.
(a) In general. Except as provided in paragraph
(b) or (c) of this section, an individual who would be assigned to more than
1 generation is assigned to the youngest of the generations to which that
individual would be assigned.
(b) Exception. Notwithstanding paragraph (a) of
this section, an adopted individual (as defined in this paragraph) will be
treated as a member of the generation that is one generation below the adoptive
parent for purposes of determining whether a transfer to the adopted individual
from the adoptive parent (or the spouse or former spouse of the adoptive parent,
or a lineal descendant of a grandparent of the adoptive parent) is subject
to chapter 13 of the Internal Revenue Code. For purposes of this paragraph
(b), an adopted individual is an individual who is—
(1) Legally adopted by the adoptive parent;
(2) A descendant of a parent of the adoptive parent (or the spouse or
former spouse of the adoptive parent);
(3) Under the age of 18 at the time of the adoption; and
(4) Not adopted primarily for the purpose of avoiding GST tax. The
determination of whether an adoption is primarily for GST tax-avoidance purposes
is made based upon all of the facts and circumstances. The most significant
factor is whether there is a bona fide parent/child relationship
between the adoptive parent and the adopted individual, in which the adoptive
parent has fully assumed all significant responsibilities for the care and
raising of the adopted child. Other factors may include (but are not limited
to), at the time of the adoption—
(i) The age of the adopted individual (for example, the younger the
age of the adopted individual, or the age of the youngest of siblings who
are all adopted together, the more likely the adoption will not be considered
primarily for GST tax-avoidance purposes); and
(ii) The relationship between the adopted individual and the individual’s
parents (for example, objective evidence of the absence or incapacity of the
parents may indicate that the adoption is not primarily for GST tax-avoidance
purposes).
(c) Special rules—(1) Corresponding
generation adjustment. If an individual’s generation assignment
is adjusted with respect to a transfer in accordance with paragraph (b) of
this section, a corresponding adjustment with respect to that transfer is
made to the generation assignment of each—
(i) Spouse or former spouse of that individual;
(ii) Descendant of that individual; and
(iii) Spouse or former spouse of each descendant of that individual.
(2) Continued application of generation assignment.
If a transfer to a trust would be a generation-skipping transfer but for
paragraph (b) of this section, any generation assignment determined under
paragraph (b) or (c) of this section continues to apply in determining whether
any subsequent distribution from (or termination of an interest in) the portion
of the trust attributable to that transfer is a generation-skipping transfer.
(d) Example. The following example illustrates
the provisions of this section:
Example. T has a child, C. C has a 20-year-old
child, GC. T legally adopts GC and transfers $100,000 to GC. GC’s
generation assignment is determined by section 2651(b)(1) and GC is assigned
to the generation that is two generations below T. In addition, because T
has legally adopted GC, GC is generally treated as a child of T under state
law. Under these circumstances, GC is an individual who is assigned to more
than one generation and the exception in §26.2651-2(b) does not apply.
Thus, the special rule under section 2651(f)(1) applies and GC is assigned
to the generation that is two generations below T. GC remains a skip person
with respect to T and the transfer to GC is a direct skip.
§26.2651-3 Effective dates.
(a) In general. The rules of §§ 26.2651-1
and 26.2651-2 are applicable for terminations, distributions, and transfers
occurring on or after July 18, 2005.
(b) Transition rule. In the case of transfers
occurring after December 31, 1997, and before July 18, 2005, taxpayers may
rely on any reasonable interpretation of section 2651(e).
For this purpose, these final regulations, as well as the proposed regulations
issued on September 3, 2004, (69 FR 53862) are treated as a reasonable interpretation
of the statute.
Mark E. Matthews, Deputy
Commissioner for Services and Enforcement.
Approved June 30, 2005.
Eric Solomon, Acting
Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Treasury.
Note
(Filed by the Office of the Federal Register on July 15, 2005, 8:45
a.m., and published in the issue of the Federal Register for July 18, 2005,
70 F.R. 41140)
The principal author of these regulations is Lian A. Mito of the Office
of Associate Chief Counsel (Passthroughs and Special Industries). However,
other personnel from the IRS and Treasury Department participated in their
development.
* * * * *
Internal Revenue Bulletin 2005-35
SEARCH:
You can either: Search all IRS Bulletin Documents issued since January 1996, or Search the entire site. For a more focused search, put your search word(s) in quotes.
2005 Document Types | 2005 Weekly IRBs
IRS Bulletins Main | Home
|
|
|