Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 1 continues to read in
part as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Par. 2. Section 1.45G-0T is added to read as follows:
§1.45G-1T Railroad track maintenance credit (temporary).
(a) In general. For purposes of section 38, the
railroad track maintenance credit (RTMC) for qualified railroad track maintenance
expenditures (QRTME) paid or incurred by an eligible taxpayer during the taxable
year is determined under this section. A taxpayer claiming the RTMC must
do so by filing Form 8900, “Qualified Railroad Track Maintenance
Credit,” with its timely filed (including extensions) Federal
income tax return for the taxable year for which the RTMC is claimed. Paragraph
(b) of this section provides definitions of terms. Paragraph (c) of this
section provides rules for computing the RTMC, including rules regarding limitations
on the amount of the credit. Paragraph (d) of this section provides rules
for assigning miles of railroad track. Paragraph (e) of this section contains
special rules. Paragraph (f) of this section contains rules for computing
the amount of the RTMC in the case of a controlled group, and for the allocation
of the group credit among members of the controlled group.
(b) Definitions. For purposes of section 45G and
this section, the following definitions apply:
(1) Class II railroad and Class III railroad have
the respective meanings given to these terms by the Surface Transportation
Board (STB).
(2) Eligible railroad track is railroad track located
within the United States that is owned or leased by a Class II railroad or
Class III railroad at the close of its taxable year. For purposes of section
45G and this section, a Class II railroad or Class III railroad owns railroad
track if the railroad track is subject to the allowance for depreciation under
section 167 by the Class II railroad or Class III railroad.
(3) Eligible taxpayer is—
(i) A Class II railroad or Class III railroad during the taxable year;
(ii) Any person that transports property using the rail facilities of
a Class II railroad or Class III railroad during the taxable year, but only
with respect to the miles of eligible railroad track assigned to the person
for that taxable year by that Class II railroad or Class III railroad under
paragraph (d) of this section; or
(iii) Any person that furnishes railroad-related property or railroad-related
services to a Class II railroad or Class III railroad during the taxable year,
but only with respect to the miles of eligible railroad track assigned to
the person for that taxable year by that Class II railroad or Class III railroad
under paragraph (d) of this section.
(4) Qualifying railroad structure is property located
within the United States that is described in the following STB property accounts
in 49 CFR Part 1201, Subpart A:
(i) Property Account 3, Grading.
(ii) Property Account 4, Other right-of-way expenditures.
(iii) Property Account 5, Tunnels and subways.
(iv) Property Account 6, Bridges, trestles, and culverts.
(v) Property Account 7, Elevated structures.
(vi) Property Account 8, Ties.
(vii) Property Account 9, Rails and other track material.
(viii) Property Account 11, Ballast.
(ix) Property Account 13, Fences, snowsheds, and signs.
(x) Property Account 27, Signals and interlockers.
(xi) Property Account 39, Public improvements; construction.
(5) Qualified railroad track maintenance expenditures (QRTME) are
expenditures for maintaining, repairing, and improving qualifying railroad
structure that is owned or leased as of January 1, 2005, by a Class II railroad
or Class III railroad. These expenditures may or may not be chargeable to
a capital account.
(6) Rail facilities of a Class II railroad or Class
III railroad are railroad yards, tracks, bridges, tunnels, wharves, docks,
stations, and other related assets that are used in the transport of freight
by a railroad and that are owned or leased by the Class II railroad or Class
III railroad.
(7) Railroad-related property is property that
is provided directly to, and is unique to, a railroad and that, in the hands
of a Class II railroad or Class III railroad, is described in—
(i) The STB property accounts 3, Grading; 5, Tunnels and subways; and
22, Storage warehouses, in 49 CFR Part 1201, Subpart A; and
(ii) Asset classes 40.1 through 40.54 in the guidance issued by the
Internal Revenue Service under section 168(i)(1) (for further guidance, for
example, see Rev. Proc. 87-56, 1987-2 C.B. 674, and §601.601(d)(2)(ii)(b)
of this chapter), except that any office building, any passenger train car,
and any miscellaneous structure if such structure is not provided directly
to, and is not unique to, a railroad are excluded from the definition of railroad-related
property.
(8) Railroad-related services are services that
are provided directly to, and are unique to, a railroad and that relate to
railroad shipping, loading and unloading of railroad freight, or repairs of
rail facilities or railroad-related property. Examples of railroad-related
services are the transport of freight by rail; the loading and unloading of
freight transported by rail; railroad bridge services; railroad track construction;
providing railroad track material or equipment; locomotive leasing or rental;
maintenance of railroad’s right-of-way (including vegetation control);
piggyback trailer ramping; rail deramping services; and freight train cars
repair services. Examples of services that are not railroad-related services
are general business services, such as, accounting and bookkeeping, marketing,
legal services; cleaning services; office building rental; banking services
(including financing of railroad-related property); and purchasing of, or
services performed on, property not described in paragraph (b)(7) of this
section.
(9) Except as provided in paragraph (e)(1) of this section, railroad
track is property described in STB property accounts 8 (ties),
9 (rails and other track material), and 11 (ballast) in 49 CFR part 1201,
Subpart A.
(10) Form 8900. If Form 8900 is revised or renumbered,
any reference in this section to that form shall be treated as a reference
to the revised or renumbered form.
(11) Examples. The application of this paragraph
(b) is illustrated by the following examples. In all examples, the taxpayers
use a calendar taxable year, and are not members of a controlled group:
Example 1. A is a manufacturer that in 2006, transports
its products by rail using the railroad tracks owned by B, a Class II railroad
that owns 500 miles of railroad track within the United States on December
31, 2006. B properly assigns for purposes of section 45G 100 miles of eligible
railroad track to A in 2006. A is an eligible taxpayer for 2006 with respect
to the 100 miles of eligible railroad track.
Example 2. C is a bank that loans money to several
Class III railroads. In 2006, C loans money to D, a Class III railroad, who
in turn uses the loan proceeds to purchase track material. Because providing
loans is not a service that is unique to a railroad, C is not providing railroad-related
services and, thus, C is not an eligible taxpayer, even if D assigns miles
of eligible railroad track to C for purposes of section 45G.
Example 3. E leases locomotives directly to Class
I, Class II, and Class III railroads. In 2006, E leases locomotives to F,
a Class II railroad that owns 200 miles of railroad track within the United
States on December 31, 2006. F properly assigns for purposes of section 45G
200 miles of eligible railroad track to E. Because locomotives are property
that is unique to a railroad, and E leases these locomotives directly to F
in 2006, E is an eligible taxpayer for 2006 with respect to the 200 miles
of eligible railroad track assigned to E by F.
(c) Determination of amount of railroad track maintenance
credit for the taxable year—(1) General amount.
Except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section, for purposes of section
38, the RTMC determined under section 45G(a) for the taxable year is equal
to 50 percent of the QRTME paid or incurred (as determined under paragraph
(c)(3) of this section) by an eligible taxpayer during the taxable year.
(2) Limitation on the credit—(i) Eligible
taxpayer is a Class II railroad or Class III railroad. If an eligible
taxpayer is a Class II railroad or Class III railroad, the RTMC determined
under paragraph (c)(1) of this section for the Class II railroad or Class
III railroad for any taxable year must not exceed $3,500 multiplied by the
sum of—
(A) The number of miles of eligible railroad track owned or leased by
the Class II railroad or Class III railroad, reduced by the number of miles
of eligible railroad track assigned under paragraph (d) of this section by
the Class II railroad or Class III railroad to another eligible taxpayer for
that taxable year; and
(B) The number of miles of eligible railroad track owned or leased by
another Class II railroad or Class III railroad that are assigned under paragraph
(d) of this section to the Class II railroad or Class III railroad for the
taxable year.
(ii) Eligible taxpayer is not a Class II railroad or Class
III railroad. If an eligible taxpayer is not a Class II railroad
or Class III railroad, the RTMC determined under paragraph (c)(1) of this
section for the eligible taxpayer for any taxable year must not exceed $3,500
multiplied by the number of miles of eligible railroad track assigned under
paragraph (d) of this section by a Class II railroad or Class III railroad
to the eligible taxpayer for the taxable year.
(iii) Effect of double track. For purposes of
this paragraph (c)(2), double track is treated as multiple lines of railroad
track, rather than as a single line of railroad track. Thus, one mile of
single track is one mile, but one mile of double track is two miles.
(3) Determination of amount of QRTME paid or incurred—(i) In
general. The term paid or incurred means,
in the case of a taxpayer using an accrual method of accounting, a liability
incurred (within the meaning of §1.446-1(c)(1)(ii)). A liability may
not be taken into account under section 45G and this section prior to the
taxable year during which the liability is incurred.
(ii) Effect of reimbursements. The amount of QRTME
treated as paid or incurred during the taxable year shall be reduced by any
amount to which the taxpayer is entitled to be reimbursed, directly or indirectly,
whether or not such reimbursement takes place during the taxable year in which
the QRTME is, but for this sentence, paid or incurred by the taxpayer. Examples
of indirect reimbursements include discounted freight shipping rates, markup
of the price for track materials, and debt forgiveness. Similarly, any amount
that an eligible taxpayer (assignee) pays a Class II railroad or Class III
railroad (assignor) in exchange for an assignment of one or more miles of
eligible railroad track under paragraph (d) of this section, is treated, for
purposes of this section, as QRTME paid or incurred by the assignee, and not
by the assignor, at the time and to the extent the assignor pays or incurs
QRTME.
(4) Examples. The application of this paragraph
(c) is illustrated by the following examples. In all examples, the taxpayers
use an accrual method of accounting and a calendar taxable year, and are not
members of a controlled group:
Example 1. Computation of RTMC; section
45G credit limitation is not exceeded. (i) G is a Class II railroad
that owns or has leased to it 1,000 miles of railroad track within the United
States on December 31, 2006. H is a manufacturer that in 2006, transports
its products by rail using the rail facilities of G. In 2006, for purposes
of section 45G, G assigns 100 miles of eligible railroad track to H and does
not make any other assignments of railroad track miles. H did not receive
any other assignments of railroad track miles in 2006. During 2006, G incurred
QRTME in the amount of $2.5 million and H incurred QRTME in the amount of
$200,000.
(ii) For 2006, G determines the tentative amount of RTMC under paragraph
(c)(1) of this section to be $1,250,000 (50% multiplied by $2,500,000 QRTME
incurred by G during 2006). G further determines G’s credit limitation
under paragraph (c)(2)(i) of this section for 2006 to be $3,150,000 ($3,500
multiplied by 900 miles of eligible railroad track (1,000 miles owned by,
or leased to, G on December 31, 2006, less 100 miles assigned by G to H in
2006)). Because G’s tentative amount of RTMC does not exceed G’s
credit limitation amount for 2006, G may claim a RTMC for 2006 in the amount
of $1,250,000.
(iii) For 2006, H determines the tentative amount of RTMC under paragraph
(c)(1) of this section to be $100,000 (50% multiplied by $200,000 QRTME incurred
by H during 2006). H further determines H’s credit limitation under
paragraph (c)(2)(ii) of this section for 2006 to be $350,000 ($3,500 multiplied
by 100 miles of eligible railroad track assigned by G to H in 2006). Because
H’s tentative amount of RTMC does not exceed H’s credit limitation
amount for 2006, H may claim a RTMC in the amount of $100,000.
Example 2. Computation of RTMC; section
45G credit limitation is exceeded. (i) The facts are the same
as in Example 1, except that G assigned for purposes
of section 45G only 50 miles of railroad track to H in 2006 and, during 2006,
H incurred QRTME in the amount of $400,000.
(ii) For 2006, G determines the tentative amount of RTMC under paragraph
(c)(1) of this section to be $1,250,000 (50% multiplied by $2,500,000 QRTME
incurred by G during 2006). G further determines G’s credit limitation
under paragraph (c)(2)(i) of this section for 2006 to be $3,325,000 ($3,500
multiplied by 950 miles of eligible railroad track (1,000 miles owned by,
or leased to, G on December 31, 2006, less 50 miles assigned by G to H in
2006)). Because G’s tentative amount of RTMC does not exceed G’s
credit limitation amount for 2006, G may claim a RTMC in the amount of $1,250,000
(iii) For 2006, H determines the tentative amount of RTMC under paragraph
(c)(1) of this section to be $200,000 (50% multiplied by $400,000 QRTME incurred
by H during 2006). H further determines H’s credit limitation under
paragraph (c)(2)(ii) of this section for 2006 to be $175,000 ($3,500 multiplied
by 50 miles of eligible railroad track assigned by G to H in 2006). Because
H’s tentative amount of RTMC exceeds H’s credit limitation amount
for 2006, H may claim a RTMC in the amount of $175,000 (the credit limitation
amount). There is no carryover of the amount of $25,000 (the tentative amount
of $200,000 less the credit limitation amount of $175,000).
Example 3. Railroad track miles assigned
for payment. (i) J is a Class II railroad that owns or has leased
to it 1,000 miles of railroad track within the United States on December 31,
2006. K is a corporation that sells ties, ballast, and other track material
to Class I, Class II, and Class III railroads. During 2006, K sold these
items to J and J incurred QRTME in the amount of $1 million. Also, on December
6, 2006, J assigned for purposes of section 45G 150 miles of eligible railroad
track to K and K paid J $800,000 for that assignment. K did not pay or incur
any QRTME during 2006.
(ii) For 2006, in accordance with paragraph (c)(3)(ii) of this section,
J is treated as having incurred QRTME in the amount of $200,000 ($1 million
QRTME actually incurred by J less the $800,000 paid by K to J for the assignment
of the railroad track miles in 2006). For 2006, J determines the tentative
amount of RTMC under paragraph (c)(1) of this section to be $100,000 (50%
multiplied by $200,000 QRTME treated as incurred by J during 2006). J further
determines J’s credit limitation amount under paragraph (c)(2)(i) of
this section for 2006 to be $2,975,000 ($3,500 multiplied by 850 miles of
eligible railroad track (1,000 miles owned by, or leased to, J on December
31, 2006, less 150 miles assigned by J to K in 2006)). Because J’s
tentative amount of RTMC does not exceed J’s credit limitation amount
for 2006, J may claim a RTMC in the amount of $100,000.
(iii) For 2006, K is an eligible taxpayer because, during 2006, K provided
railroad-related property to J and received an assignment of eligible railroad
track miles from J. Under paragraph (c)(3)(ii) of this section, K is treated
as having incurred QRTME in the amount of $800,000 (the amount paid by K to
J for the assignment of the railroad track miles in 2006). For 2006, K determines
the tentative amount of RTMC under paragraph (c)(1) of this section to be
$400,000 (50% multiplied by $800,000 QRTME treated as incurred by K during
2006). K further determines K’s credit limitation amount under paragraph
(c)(2)(ii) of this section for 2006 to be $525,000 ($3,500 multiplied by 150
miles of eligible railroad track assigned by J in 2006). Because K’s
tentative amount of RTMC does not exceed K’s credit limitation amount
for 2006, K may claim a RTMC in the amount of $400,000.
Example 4. Reimbursement of QRTME.
(i) L is a Class III railroad that owns or has leased to it 500 miles of
railroad track within the United States on December 31, 2006. M is a manufacturer
that in 2006 transports its products by rail using the rail facilities of
L. During 2006, L did not incur any QRTME. Also, in 2006, L assigned for
purposes of section 45G 200 miles of eligible railroad track to M and agreed
to reduce L’s freight shipping rates to M by $250,000 in exchange for
M upgrading these railroad track miles. Consequently, during 2006, M incurred
QRTME of $500,000 to upgrade these 200 miles of railroad track and L reduced
L’s freight shipping rates for M by $250,000.
(ii) For 2006, M is an eligible taxpayer because, during 2006, M transported
property using the rail facilities of L and received an assignment of eligible
railroad track miles from L. Under paragraph (c)(3)(ii) of this section,
the amount of QRTME paid or incurred by M during 2006 is $250,000 ($500,000
QRTME actually incurred by M, less the reimbursement of $250,000 by L to M).
For 2006, M determines the tentative amount of RTMC under paragraph (c)(1)
of this section to be $125,000 (50% multiplied by $250,000 QRTME incurred
by M during 2006). M further determines M’s credit limitation amount
under paragraph (c)(2)(ii) of this section for 2006 to be $700,000 ($3,500
multiplied by 200 miles of eligible railroad track assigned by L to M in 2006).
Because M’s tentative amount of RTMC does not exceed M’s credit
limitation amount for 2006, M may claim a RTMC in the amount of $125,000.
(d) Assignment of track miles—(1) In
general. An assignment of any mile of eligible railroad track
under this paragraph (d) is a designation by a Class II railroad or Class
III railroad that is made solely for purposes of section 45G and this section
of a specific number of miles of eligible railroad track as being assigned
to another eligible taxpayer for a taxable year. A designation must be in
writing and must include the name and taxpayer identification number of the
assignee, and the information required under the rules of paragraph (d)(4)(iii)(B)
of this section. A designation requires no transfer of legal title or other indicia of
ownership of the eligible railroad track, and need not specify the location
of any assigned mile of eligible railroad track. Further, an assigned mile
of eligible railroad track need not correspond to any specific mile of eligible
railroad track with respect to which the eligible taxpayer actually pays or
incurs the QRTME. For purposes of this paragraph (d), double track is treated
as multiple lines of railroad track, rather than as a single line of railroad
track. Thus, one mile of single track is one mile, but one mile of double
track is two miles.
(2) Assignment eligibility. Only a Class II railroad
or Class III railroad may assign a mile of eligible railroad track. If a
Class II railroad or Class III railroad assigns a mile of eligible railroad
track to an eligible taxpayer, the assignee is not permitted to reassign any
mile of eligible railroad track to another eligible taxpayer. The maximum
number of miles of eligible railroad track that may be assigned by a Class
II railroad or Class III railroad for any taxable year is its total miles
of eligible railroad track less the miles of eligible railroad track that
the Class II railroad or Class III railroad retains for itself in determining
its RTMC for the taxable year.
(3) Effective date of assignment. If a Class II
railroad or Class III railroad assigns a mile of eligible railroad track,
the assignment is treated as being made by the Class II railroad or Class
III railroad at the close of its taxable year in which the assignment was
made. With respect to the assignee, the assignment of a mile of eligible
railroad track is taken into account for the taxable year of the assignee
that includes the date the assignment is treated as being made by the assignor
Class II railroad or Class III railroad under this paragraph (d)(3).
(4) Assignment information statement—(i) In
general. A taxpayer must file Form 8900, “Qualified
Railroad Track Maintenance Credit,” with its timely filed
(including extensions) Federal income tax return for the taxable year for
which the taxpayer assigns any mile of eligible railroad track, even if the
taxpayer is not itself claiming the RTMC for that taxable year.
(ii) Assignor. Except as provided in paragraph
(d)(4)(iv) of this section, a Class II railroad or Class III railroad (assignor)
that assigns one or more miles of eligible railroad track during a taxable
year to one or more eligible taxpayers must attach to the assignor’s
Form 8900 for that taxable year an information statement providing—
(A) The name and taxpayer identification number of each assignee;
(B) The total number of miles of the assignor’s eligible railroad
track;
(C) The number of miles of eligible railroad track assigned by the assignor
to each assignee for the taxable year; and
(D) The total number of miles of eligible railroad track assigned by
the assignor to all assignees for the taxable year.
(iii) Assignee. Except as provided in paragraph
(d)(4)(iv) of this section, an eligible taxpayer (assignee) that has received
an assignment of miles of eligible railroad track during its taxable year
from a Class II railroad or Class III railroad, and that claims the RTMC for
that taxable year, must attach to the assignee’s Form 8900 for that
taxable year a statement—
(A) Providing the total number of miles of eligible railroad track assigned
to the assignee for the assignee’s taxable year; and
(B) Attesting that the assignee has in writing, and has retained as
part of the assignee’s records for purposes of §1.6001-1(a), the
following information from each assignor:
(1) The name and taxpayer identification number
of each assignor;
(2) The date of each assignment made by each assignor
(as determined under paragraph (d)(3) of this section) to the assignee; and
(3) The number of miles of eligible railroad track
assigned by each assignor to the assignee for the assignee’s taxable
year.
(iv) Special rule for 2005 returns. If an eligible
taxpayer’s Federal income tax return for a taxable year beginning after
December 31, 2004, and ending before September 7, 2006, is filed before October
9, 2006, and the eligible taxpayer wants to apply paragraph (g)(2) of this
section but did not include with that return the information specified in
paragraph (d)(4)(ii) or (iii) of this section, as applicable, the eligible
taxpayer must attach a statement containing the information specified in paragraph
(d)(4)(ii) or (iii) of this section, as applicable, to either—
(A) The eligible taxpayer’s next filed original Federal income
tax return; or
(B) The eligible taxpayer’s amended Federal income tax return
that is filed pursuant to paragraph (g)(2) of this section, provided that
amended Federal income tax return is filed by the eligible taxpayer before
its next filed original Federal income tax return.
(5) Special rules—(i) Effect of
subsequent dispositions of eligible railroad track during the assignment year.
If a Class II railroad or Class III railroad assigns one or more miles of
eligible railroad track that it owned or leased as of the actual date of the
assignment, but does not own or lease any eligible railroad track at the close
of the taxable year in which the assignment is made by the Class II railroad
or Class III railroad, the assignment is not valid for that taxable year for
purposes of section 45G and this section.
(ii) Effect of multiple assignments of eligible railroad track
miles during the same taxable year. If a Class II railroad or
Class III railroad assigns more miles of eligible railroad track than it owned
or leased as of the close of the taxable year in which the assignment is made
by the Class II railroad or Class III railroad, the assignment is valid for
purposes of section 45G and this section only with respect to the name of
the assignee and the number of miles listed by the assignor Class II railroad
or Class III railroad on the statement required under paragraph (d)(4)(ii)
of this section and only to the extent of the maximum miles of eligible railroad
track that may be assigned by the assignor Class II railroad or Class III
railroad as determined under paragraph (d)(2) of this section. If the total
number of miles on this statement exceeds the maximum miles of eligible railroad
track that may be assigned by the assignor Class II railroad or Class III
railroad (as determined under paragraph (d)(2) of this section), the total
number of miles on the statement shall be reduced by the excess amount of
miles. This reduction is allocated among each assignee listed on the statement
in proportion to the total number of miles listed on the statement for that
assignee.
(6) Examples. The application of this paragraph
(d) is illustrated by the following examples. In none of the examples are
the taxpayers members of a controlled group:
Example 1. Assignor and assignee have
the same taxable year. (i) N, a calendar year taxpayer, is a Class
II railroad that owns 500 miles of railroad track within the United States
on December 31, 2006. O, a calendar year taxpayer, is not a railroad, but
is a taxpayer that provides railroad-related property to N during 2006. On
November 7, 2006, N assigns for purposes of section 45G 300 miles of eligible
railroad track to O. O receives no other assignment of eligible railroad
track in 2006. O pays or incurs QRTME in the amount of $100,000 in November
2006, and $50,000 in February 2007. N and O each file Form 8900 with their
timely filed Federal income tax returns for 2006 and attach the statement
required by paragraph (d)(4)(ii) and (iii), respectively, of this section
reporting the assignment of the 300 miles of eligible railroad track to O.
(ii) The assignment of the 300 miles of eligible railroad track made
by N to O on November 7, 2006, is treated as made on December 31, 2006 (at
the close of the N’s taxable year). Consequently, the assignment is
taken into account by O for O’s taxable year ending on December 31,
2006. For 2006, O is an eligible taxpayer because, during 2006, O provides
railroad-related property to N and receives an assignment of 300 eligible
railroad track miles from N. For 2006, O determines the tentative amount
of RTMC under paragraph (c)(1) of this section to be $50,000 (50% multiplied
by $100,000 QRTME paid or incurred by O during 2006). O further determines
the credit limitation amount under paragraph (c)(2)(i) of this section for
2006 to be $1,050,000 ($3,500 multiplied by 300 miles of eligible railroad
track assigned by N to O on December 31, 2006). Because O’s tentative
amount of RTMC does not exceed O’s credit limitation amount for 2006,
O may claim a RMTC for 2006 in the amount of $50,000.
Example 2. Assignor and assignee have
different taxable years. (i) The facts are the same as in Example
1, except that O’s taxable year ends on March 31.
(ii) The assignment of the 300 miles of eligible railroad track made
by N to O on November 7, 2006, is treated as made on December 31, 2006. As
a result, the assignment is taken into account by O for O’s taxable
year ending on March 31, 2007. Thus, for the taxable year ending on March
31, 2007, O determines the tentative amount of RMTC under paragraph (c)(1)
of this section to be $75,000 (50% multiplied by $150,000 QRTME incurred by
O during its taxable year ending March 31, 2007). Because O’s tentative
amount of RTMC does not exceed O’s credit limitation amount for 2006,
O may claim a RMTC for 2006 in the amount of $75,000.
Example 3. Assignment location differs
from QRTME location. (i) P, a calendar-year taxpayer, is a Class
III railroad that owns or has leased to it 200 miles of railroad track within
the United States on December 31, 2006. P owns 50 miles of this railroad
track and leases 150 miles of this railroad track from Q, a Class I railroad.
On February 8, 2006, P assigns for purposes of section 45G 50 miles of eligible
railroad track to R. R is not a railroad, but is a taxpayer that ships products
using the 50 miles of eligible railroad track owned by P, and R paid $100,000
in 2006 to P to enable P to upgrade these 50 miles of eligible railroad track.
In March 2006, P also assigns for purposes of section 45G 150 miles of eligible
railroad track to S. S is not a railroad, but is a taxpayer that provides
railroad-related property to P, and S paid $400,000 to P to enable P to upgrade
P’s 200 miles of eligible railroad track. For 2006, P pays or incurs
QRTME in the amount of $500,000 to upgrade the 150 miles of eligible railroad
track that it leases from Q and pays or incurs no QRTME on the 50 miles of
eligible railroad track that it owns. For 2006, P receives no other assignment
of eligible railroad track miles and did not retain any eligible railroad
track miles for itself. Also, R and S do not pay or incur any other amounts
that would qualify as QRTME during 2006. P, R, and S each file Form 8900
with their timely filed Federal income tax returns for 2006 and attach the
statement required by paragraph (d)(4)(ii) or (iii) of this section, whichever
applies, reporting the assignment of eligible railroad track by P to R or
S in 2006.
(ii) For 2006, in accordance with paragraph (c)(3)(ii) of this section,
P is treated as having incurred QRTME in the amount of $0 ($500,000 QRTME
actually incurred by P less the $100,000 paid by R to P for the assignment
of the 50 miles of eligible railroad track and the $400,000 paid by S to P
for the assignment of the 150 miles of eligible railroad track). Further,
P assigned all of its eligible railroad track miles to R and S for 2006.
Accordingly, for 2006, P may not claim any RTMC.
(iii) For 2006, R is an eligible taxpayer because, during 2006, R ships
property using the rail facilities of P and receives an assignment of 50 eligible
railroad track miles from P. In accordance with paragraph (c)(3)(ii) of this
section, R is treated as having incurred QRTME in the amount of $100,000 (the
amount paid by R to P for the assignment of the eligible railroad track miles
in 2006) even though no work was performed on the 50 miles of eligible railroad
track that was assigned by P to R. For 2006, R determines the tentative amount
of RTMC under paragraph (c)(1) of this section to be $50,000 (50% multiplied
by $100,000 QRTME treated as incurred by R during 2006). R further determines
the credit limitation amount under paragraph (c)(2)(ii) of this section to
be $175,000 ($3,500 multiplied by 50 miles of eligible railroad track assigned
by P to R in 2006). Because R’s tentative amount of RTMC does not exceed
R’s credit limitation amount for 2006, R may claim a RTMC for 2006 in
the amount of $50,000.
(iv) For 2006, S is an eligible taxpayer because, during 2006, S provides
railroad-related property to P and receives an assignment of 150 eligible
railroad track miles from P. In accordance with paragraph (c)(3)(ii) of this
section, S is treated as having incurred QRTME in the amount of $400,000 (amount
paid by S to P for the assignment of the eligible railroad track miles in
2006). For 2006, S determines the tentative amount of RTMC under paragraph
(c)(1) of this section to be $200,000 (50% multiplied by $400,000 QRTME treated
as incurred by S during 2006). S further determines the credit limitation
amount under paragraph (c)(2)(ii) of this section to be $525,000 ($3,500 multiplied
by 150 miles of eligible railroad track assigned by P to S in 2006). Because
S’s tentative amount of RTMC does not exceed S’s credit limitation
amount for 2006, S may claim a RTMC for 2006 in the amount of $200,000.
Example 4. Multiple assignments of track
miles. (i) T, a calendar-year taxpayer, is a Class III railroad
that owns or has leased to it 200 miles of railroad track within the United
States on December 31, 2006. T owns 75 miles of this railroad track and leases
125 miles of this railroad track from U, a Class I railroad. V and W are
not railroads, but are both taxpayers that provide railroad-related services
to T during 2006. On January 15, 2006, T assigns for purposes of section
45G 200 miles of eligible railroad track to V. V agrees to incur, in 2006,
$1.4 million of QRTME to upgrade a portion of/segment of these 200 miles of
eligible railroad track. Due to unexpected financial difficulties, V only
incurs $250,000 of QRTME during 2006 and on May 15, 2006, T learns that V
is unable to incur the remainder of the QRTME. On June 15, 2006, T assigns
for purposes of section 45G the 200 miles of railroad track to W. In 2006,
W incurs $1,100,000 of QRTME to upgrade a portion of/segment of the railroad
track. For 2006, T receives no other assignment of eligible railroad track
miles and did not retain any eligible railroad track miles for itself. V
and W do not receive any other assignments of miles of eligible railroad track
miles from a Class II railroad or Class III railroad during 2006. T and W
each file Form 8900 with their timely filed Federal income tax returns for
2006, and attach the statement required by paragraph (d)(4)(ii) and (iii),
respectively, of this section, reporting the assignment of 200 miles of eligible
railroad track to W.
(ii) Because T did not retain any miles of eligible railroad track for
itself for 2006, the maximum miles of eligible railroad track that may be
assigned by T for 2006 is 200 miles pursuant to paragraph (d)(2) of this section.
On the statement required by paragraph (d)(4)(ii) of this section, T assigned
a total of 200 miles of eligible railroad track to W. Consequently, because
T did not list V as an assignee on T’s statement required by paragraph
(d)(4)(ii) of this section, V did not receive an assignment of eligible railroad
track miles from T during 2006 and V is not an eligible taxpayer for 2006.
Thus, for 2006, V may not claim any RTMC even though V incurred QRTME in
the amount of $250,000.
(iii) For 2006, W is an eligible taxpayer because, during 2006, W provides
railroad-related services to T and receives an assignment of 200 eligible
railroad track miles from T. W determines the tentative amount of RTMC under
paragraph (c)(1) of this section to be $550,000 (50% multiplied by $1,100,000
QRTME incurred by W during 2006). W further determines the credit limitation
amount under paragraph (c)(2)(ii) of this section to be $700,000 ($3,500 multiplied
by the 200 miles of eligible railroad track assigned by T to W in 2006).
Because W’s tentative amount of RTMC does not exceed W’s credit
limitation amount for 2006, W may claim a RTMC for 2006 in the amount of $550,000.
Example 5. Multiple assignments of track
miles. (i) Same facts as in Example 4, except
T, to its Form 8900 for 2006, attaches the statement required by paragraph
(d)(4)(ii) of this section assigning 200 miles of eligible railroad track
to W and 200 miles of eligible railroad track to V.
(ii) Because T did not retain any miles of eligible railroad track for
itself for 2006, the maximum miles of eligible railroad track that may be
assigned by T for 2006 is 200 miles pursuant to paragraph (d)(2) of this section.
However, on the statement required by paragraph (d)(4)(ii) of this section,
T assigned a total of 400 miles of eligible railroad track (200 miles to W
and 200 miles to V). Consequently, the 400 miles of eligible railroad track
on this statement must be reduced to the 200 maximum miles of eligible railroad
track available for assignment for 2006. Because the statement reports 200
miles of eligible railroad track assigned to each W and V, the reduction of
200 miles (400 total miles of eligible railroad track on the statement less
200 maximum miles of eligible railroad track available for assignment) is
allocated pro-rata between W and V and, therefore, 100
miles each to W and V. Thus, pursuant to paragraph (d)(5)(ii) of this section,
the number of miles of eligible railroad track assigned by T to W and V for
2006 is 100 miles each.
(iii) For 2006, V is an eligible taxpayer because, during 2006, V provides
railroad-related services to T and receives an assignment of 100 eligible
railroad track miles from T. V determines the tentative amount of RTMC under
paragraph (c)(1) of this section to be $125,000 (50% multiplied by $250,000
QRTME incurred by V during 2006). V further determines the credit limitation
amount under paragraph (c)(2)(ii) of this section to be $350,000 ($3,500 multiplied
by the 100 miles of eligible railroad track assigned by T to V in 2006).
Because V’s tentative amount of RTMC does not exceed W’s credit
limitation amount for 2006, V may claim a RTMC for 2006 in the amount of $125,000.
(iv) For 2006, W is an eligible taxpayer because, during 2006, W provides
railroad-related services to T and receives an assignment of 100 eligible
railroad track miles from T. W determines the tentative amount of RTMC under
paragraph (c)(1) of this section to be $550,000 (50% multiplied by $1,100,000
QRTME incurred by W during 2006). W further determines the credit limitation
amount under paragraph (c)(2)(ii) of this section to be $350,000 ($3,500 multiplied
by the 100 miles of eligible railroad track assigned by T to W in 2006).
Because W’s tentative amount of RTMC exceeds W’s credit limitation
amount for 2006, W may claim a RTMC for 2006 in the amount of $350,000 (the
credit limitation). There is no carryover of the amount of $200,000 (the
tentative amount of $550,000 less the credit limitation amount of $350,000).
(e) Special rules—(1) Adjustments
to basis—(i) In general. All or some
of the QRTME paid or incurred by an eligible taxpayer during the taxable year
may be required to be capitalized under section 263(a) as a tangible asset
or as an intangible asset. See, for example, §1.263(a)-4(d)(8), which
requires capitalization of amounts paid or incurred by a taxpayer to produce
or improve real property owned by another (except to the extent the taxpayer
is selling services at fair market value to produce or improve the real property)
if the real property can reasonably be expected to produce significant economic
benefits for the taxpayer. The basis of the tangible asset or intangible
asset includes the capitalized amount of the QRTME.
(ii) Basis adjustment made to railroad track.
An eligible taxpayer must reduce the adjusted basis of any railroad track
with respect to which the eligible taxpayer claims the RTMC. For purposes
of section 45G(e)(3) and this paragraph (e)(1), the adjusted basis of any
railroad track with respect to which the eligible taxpayer claims the RTMC
is limited to the amount of QRTME, if any, that is required to be capitalized
into the qualifying railroad structure or an intangible asset. The adjusted
basis of the railroad track is reduced by the amount of the RTMC allowable
(as determined under paragraph (c) of this section) by the eligible taxpayer
for the taxable year, but not below zero. This reduction is taken into account
at the time the QRTME is paid or incurred by an eligible taxpayer and before
the depreciation deduction with respect to such railroad track is determined
for the taxable year for which the RTMC is allowable. If all or some of the
QRTME paid or incurred by an eligible taxpayer during the taxable year is
capitalized under section 263(a) to more than one asset, whether tangible
or intangible (for example, railroad track and bridges), the reduction to
the basis of these assets under this paragraph (e)(1)(ii) is allocated among
each of the assets subject to the reduction in proportion to the unadjusted
basis of each asset at the time the QRTME is paid or incurred during that
taxable year.
(iii) Examples. The application of this paragraph
(e)(1) is illustrated by the following examples. In each example, all taxpayers
use a calendar taxable year, and no taxpayers are members of a controlled
group.
Example 1. (i) X is a Class II railroad that owns
500 miles of railroad track within the United States on December 31, 2006.
During 2006, X incurs $1 million of QRTME for maintaining this railroad track.
X uses the track maintenance allowance method for track structure expenditures
(for further guidance, see Rev. Proc. 2002-65, 2002-2 C.B. 700, and §601.601(d)(2)(ii)(b)
of this chapter). Assume all of the $1 million QRTME is track structure expenditures
and none of it was expended for new track structure.
(ii) For 2006, X determines the tentative amount of RTMC under paragraph
(c)(1) of this section to be $500,000 (50% multiplied by $1 million QRTME
incurred by X during 2006). X further determines the credit limitation amount
under paragraph (c)(2)(i) of this section for 2006 to be $1,750,000 ($3,500
multiplied by 500 miles of eligible railroad track). Because X’s tentative
amount of RTMC does not exceed X’s credit limitation amount for 2006,
X may claim a RTMC for 2006 in the amount of $500,000.
(iii) Of the $1 million QRTME incurred by X during 2006, X determines
under the track maintenance allowance method that $750,000 is the track maintenance
allowance under section 162 and $250,000 is the capitalized amount for the
track structure. In accordance with paragraph (e)(1)(ii) of this section,
X reduces the capitalized amount of $250,000 by the RTMC of $500,000 claimed
by X for 2006, but not below zero. Thus, the capitalized amount of $250,000
is reduced to zero. X also deducts under section 162 a track maintenance
allowance of $750,000 on its 2006 Federal income tax return.
Example 2. (i) Y is a Class II railroad that owns
or has leased to it 500 miles of eligible railroad track within the United
States on December 31, 2006. Z is not a railroad, but is a taxpayer that,
in 2006, transports its products using the rail facilities of Y. In 2006,
Y assigns for purposes of section 45G 300 miles of eligible railroad track
to Z. Z does not receive any other assignments of eligible railroad track
miles in 2006. During 2006, Z incurs QRTME in the amount of $1 million, and
Y does not incur any QRTME. Y and Z each file Form 8900 with their timely
filed Federal income tax returns for 2006 and attach the statement required
by paragraph (d)(4)(ii) and (iii), respectively, of this section reporting
the assignment of the 300 miles of eligible railroad track to Z.
(ii) For 2006, Z determines the tentative amount of RTMC under paragraph
(c)(1) of this section to be $500,000 (50% multiplied by $1 million QRTME
incurred by Z during 2006). Z further determines the credit limitation amount
under paragraph (c)(2)(ii) of this section for 2006 to be $1,050,000 ($3,500
multiplied by 300 miles of eligible railroad track assigned by Y to Z in 2006).
Because Z’s tentative amount of RTMC does not exceed Z’s credit
limitation amount for 2006, Z may claim a RTMC for 2006 in the amount of $500,000.
(iii) For 2006, Z also must determine the portion of the $1 million
QRTME that Z incurs that is required to be capitalized under section 263(a),
and the portion that is a section 162 expense. Because Z is not a Class II
railroad or Class III railroad, Z cannot use the track maintenance allowance
method. Assume that all of the QRTME constitutes an intangible asset under
§1.263(a)-4(d)(8) and, therefore, is required to be capitalized by Z
under section 263(a) as an intangible asset. In accordance with paragraph
(e)(1)(ii) of this section, Z reduces the capitalized amount of $1 million
by the RTMC of $500,000 claimed by Z for 2006. Thus, the capitalized amount
of $1 million for the intangible asset is reduced to $500,000. Further, pursuant
to §1.167(a)-3(b)(1)(iv), Z may treat this intangible asset with an adjusted
basis of $500,000 as having a useful life of 25 years for purposes of the
depreciation allowance under section 167(a).
(2) Coordination with section 61. Except as specifically
provided in the Code and regulations under the Code, the owner of qualifying
railroad structure has gross income if another person paid or incurred QRTME
for the owner’s qualifying railroad structure and that person does not
have a depreciable interest in the tangible improvements made by the QRTME.
See, for example, section 109, which excludes from gross income of the lessor,
the value of property attributable to buildings or other improvements made
by a lessee.
(f) Controlled groups—(1) In general.
Pursuant to section 45G(e)(2), if an eligible taxpayer is a member of a controlled
group of corporations, rules similar to the rules in §1.41-6T apply for
determining the amount of the RTMC under section 45G(a) and this section.
To determine the amount of RTMC (if any) allowable to a trade or business
that at the end of its taxable year is a member of a controlled group, a taxpayer
must—
(i) Compute the group credit in the manner described in paragraph (f)(3)
of this section; and
(ii) Allocate the group credit among the members of the group in the
manner described in paragraph (f)(4) of this section.
(2) Definitions. For purposes of section 45G(e)(2)
and paragraph (f) of this section—
(i) A trade or business is a sole proprietorship,
a partnership, a trust, an estate, or a corporation that is carrying on a
trade or business (within the meaning of section 162). Any corporation that
is a member of a commonly controlled group shall be deemed to be carrying
on a trade or business if any other member of that group is carrying on any
trade or business;
(ii) Group and controlled group means
a controlled group of corporations, as defined in section 41(f)(5), or a group
of trades or businesses under common control. For rules for determining whether
trades or businesses are under common control, see §1.52-1(b) through
(g);
(iii) Group credit means the RTMC (if any) allowable
to a controlled group;
(iv) Consolidated group has the meaning set forth
in §1.1502-1(h); and
(v) Credit year means the taxable year for which
the member is computing the RTMC.
(3) Computation of the group credit. All members
of a controlled group are treated as a single taxpayer for purposes of computing
the RTMC. The group credit is computed by applying all of the section 45G
computational rules (including the rules set forth in this section) on an
aggregate basis.
(4) Allocation of the group credit—(i) In
general. (A) To the extent the group credit (if any) computed
under paragraph (f)(3) of this section does not exceed the sum of the stand-alone
entity credits of all of the members of a controlled group, computed under
paragraph (f)(4)(ii) of this section, such group credit shall be allocated
among the members of the controlled group in proportion to the stand-alone
entity credits of the members of the controlled group, computed under paragraph
(f)(4)(ii) of this section:
(B) To the extent that the group credit (if any) computed under paragraph
(f)(3) of this section exceeds the sum of the stand-alone entity credits of
all of the members of the controlled group, computed under paragraph (f)(4)(ii)
of this section, such excess shall be allocated among the members of a controlled
group in proportion to the QRTMEs of the members of the controlled group:
(ii) Stand-alone entity credit. The term stand-alone
entity credit means the RTMC (if any) that would be allowable to
a member of a controlled group if the credit were computed as if section 45G(e)(2)
did not apply, except that the member must apply the rules provided in paragraphs
(f)(5) (relating to consolidated groups) and (f)(8) (relating to intra-group
transactions) of this section.
(5) Special rules for consolidated groups—(i) In
general. For purposes of applying paragraph (f)(4) of this section,
a consolidated group whose members are members of a controlled group is treated
as a single member of the controlled group and a single stand-alone entity
credit is computed for the consolidated group.
(ii) Special rule for allocation of group credit among consolidated
group members. The portion of the group credit that is allocated
to a consolidated group is allocated to the members of the consolidated group
in accordance with the principles of paragraph (f)(4) of this section. However,
for this purpose, the stand-alone entity credit of a member of a consolidated
group is computed without regard to section 45G(e)(2).
(6) Tax accounting periods used—(i) In
general. The credit allowable to a member of a controlled group
is that member’s share of the group credit computed as of the end of
that member’s taxable year. In computing the group credit for a group
whose members have different taxable years, a member generally should treat
the taxable year of another member that ends with or within the credit year
of the computing member as the credit year of that other member. For example,
Q, R, and S are members of a controlled group of corporations. Both Q and
R are calendar year taxpayers. S files a return using a fiscal year ending
June 30. For purposes of computing the group credit at the end of Q’s
and R’s taxable year on December 31, S’s fiscal year ending June
30, which ends within Q’s and R’s taxable year, is treated as
S’s credit year.
(ii) Special rule when timing of QRTME is manipulated.
If the timing of QRTME by members using different tax accounting periods is
manipulated to generate a credit in excess of the amount that would be allowable
if all members of the group used the same tax accounting period, then the
appropriate Internal Revenue Service official in the operating division that
has examination jurisdiction of the return may require each member of the
group to calculate the credit in the current taxable year and all future years
as if all members of the group had the same taxable year and base period as
the computing member.
(7) Membership during taxable year in more than one group.
A trade or business may be a member of only one group for a taxable year.
If, without application of this paragraph (f)(7), a business would be a member
of more than one group at the end of its taxable year, the business shall
be treated as a member of the group in which it was included for its preceding
taxable year. If the business was not included for its preceding taxable
year in any group in which it could be included as of the end of its taxable
year, the business shall designate in its timely filed (including extensions)
federal income tax return for the taxable year the group in which it is being
included. If the business does not so designate, then the appropriate Internal
Revenue Service official in the operating division that has examination jurisdiction
of the return will determine the group in which the business is to be included.
If the Federal income tax return for a taxable year beginning after December
31, 2004, and ending before September 7, 2006, is filed before October 9,
2006, and the business wants to apply paragraph (g)(2) of this section but
did not designate its group membership in that return, the business must designate
its group membership for that year either—
(i) In its next filed original Federal income tax return; or
(ii) In its amended Federal income tax return that is filed pursuant
to paragraph (g)(2) of this section, provided that amended Federal income
tax return is filed by the business before its next filed original Federal
income tax return.
(8) Intra-group transactions—(i) In
general. Because all members of a group under common control are
treated as a single taxpayer for purposes of determining the RTMC, transfers
between members of the group are generally disregarded.
(ii) Payment for QRTME. Amounts paid or incurred
by the owner (or lessor) of eligible railroad track to another member of the
group for QRTME shall be taken into account as QRTME by the owner (or lessor)
of the eligible railroad track for purposes of section 45G only to the extent
of the lesser of—
(A) The amount paid or incurred to the other member; or
(B) The amount that would have been considered paid or incurred by the
other member for the QRTME, if the QRTME was not reimbursed by the owner (or
lessor) of the eligible railroad track.
(g) Effective date—(1) In general.
(i) Except as provided in paragraphs (g)(2) and (g)(3) of this section, this
section applies to taxable years ending on or after September 7, 2006, and
beginning before January 1, 2008.
(ii) The applicability of this section expires on September 7, 2009.
(2) Application of regulation project REG-142270-05 to pre-effective
date. A taxpayer may apply this section to taxable years beginning
after December 31, 2004, and ending before September 7, 2006, provided that
the taxpayer applies all provisions in this section to the taxable year.
(3) Special rules for 2005 returns. If a taxpayer’s
Federal income tax return for a taxable year beginning after December 31,
2004, and ending before September 7, 2006, is filed before October 9, 2006,
and the taxpayer is not filing an amended Federal income tax return for that
taxable year pursuant to paragraph (g)(2) of this section before the taxpayer’s
next filed original Federal income tax return, see paragraphs (d)(3)(iv) and
(f)(7) of this section for the statements that must be attached to the taxpayer’s
next filed original Federal income tax return.