April 01, 1998
Illegal Tax Protesters
Illegal tax protest movements have been around for decades,
springing up in different areas of the country and in a variety of
forms. These groups and/or individuals, known as illegal tax
protesters, deprive the government of substantial revenue. Illegal
tax protesters frequently lure otherwise innocent taxpayers into
participating in their schemes to pay little or no taxes. A recent
study found that 47,000 illegal tax protesters owed more than $540
million in taxes -- 2.3% of the total accounts receivable due from
individuals. Illegal tax protesters use a variety of false or
misleading arguments for not paying taxes, and advise taxpayers not
to comply with federal tax laws.
Constitutional Arguments
1. First Amendment. These illegal tax protesters argue that using
the Freedom of Religion clause of the First Amendment can reduce
income tax liability. A common scheme calls for individual taxpayers
to obtain minister's credentials and a church or religious order
charter by mail for a fee. The individuals set up a new organization
that purports to be a church, religious order, or other religious
organization. They then take a vow of poverty and assign their
assets and income to the new organization. Taking a purported vow of
poverty or claiming fraudulent contributions to filter money through
a church is illegal. The tax law affords benefits to churches and
other religious organizations and to individuals who make gifts or
contributions to these organizations. The law requires, however,
that organizations claiming these benefits actually be operated for
religious purposes.
2. Fourth and Fifth Amendments. These illegal tax protesters argue
that filing a Form 1040 violates the Fourth Amendment right to
privacy or the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination.
However, the courts have consistently held that disclosure of
routine financial information required on a tax return does not
incriminate an individual or violate the right to privacy.
Sixteenth Amendment. These illegal tax protesters argue the
Constitutional amendment establishing the basis for income tax was
never properly ratified. However, the Sixteenth Amendment was
ratified on February 3, 1913, and it states "The Congress shall have
power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source
derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without
regard to any census enumeration."
Internal Revenue Code Arguments
These illegal tax protesters argue that:
1. there is no Internal Revenue Code that imposes taxes;
2. only "individuals" are required to pay taxes; or
3. the government can assess taxes only against people who file
returns.
The tax law is found in Title 26 of the United States Code.
Section 6012 of the Code makes clear that only people whose income
falls below a certain level do not have to file returns. Section
6201 of the Code states that the Secretary of the Treasury is
required to make assessments "of all taxes imposed by this title
[Title 26]."
Trust Arguments
These illegal tax protesters argue that forming a business trust
to hold your income and assets will avoid taxes or that a family
estate trust will allow you to reduce or eliminate your tax
liability. In truth, establishing a trust, foreign or domestic, for
the sole purpose of hiding your income and assets from taxation is
illegal and will not absolve you of your tax liability.
Countering Illegal Tax Protester Movements
The Internal Revenue Service has focused its efforts against
illegal tax protester movements by adopting a multi-functional
compliance approach.
The IRS helps otherwise innocent taxpayers who have been misled
by illegal tax protesters to rejoin the system.
The IRS vigorously pursues enforcement actions against those who
continue to promote schemes or entice others to violate the law.
Regardless of the argument the illegal tax protesters use, each
movement has two things in common: the arguments are consistently
rejected by the courts and the participants may face IRS enforcement
action.
The IRS has one of the highest conviction rates in federal law
enforcement. In addition to the courts handing down substantial
prison sentences, those convicted must also pay fines, taxes and
penalties.
Previous | Next
1998 IRS News Releases | News Releases Main | Home
|